Forest plan is alive -- so far: Quincy
proposal kept in budget bill
By Jane Braxton Little
Bee Correspondent
(Published Oct. 17, 1998)
QUINCY -- When negotiations over a $500 billion omnibus
appropriations
bill ended Friday with a proposal by the Quincy Library Group
still attached
and intact, members of the grass-roots coalition appeared more
stunned than
exhilarated.
After a bruising, yearlong battle with national environmental
groups over their
plan to manage 2.5 million acres of national forest in the
northern Sierra
Nevada, the group's loggers and environmentalists, union and
civic leader
members were not quite ready to celebrate.
Instead, most of them were tromping through the woods on a field
trip with
U.S. Forest Service officials to review how they will monitor the
work
proposed for streams, meadows and forest thickets.
"We didn't think this day would ever come. We're too busy
working to jump
for joy just yet," said Linda Blum, a former Audubon
employee and Quincy
Library Group member.
California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat who sponsored the
legislation in
the Senate in 1997, hailed its continued survival as a victory
for local
consensus decision-making.
"It proves that even some of the most intractable
environmental issues can be
resolved if people work together toward a common goal," she
said.
The Quincy Library Group formed in 1993 after representatives of
Sierra
Pacific Industries asked Michael Jackson, a Quincy environmental
attorney, to
work with them to keep the local timber-dependent economy from
collapsing.
The group took its name from the only neutral meeting place
members could
agree upon. It attracted support from business owners, lumber
union leaders
and other local officials who had traditionally been at odds over
managing
forest resources.
The legislation they crafted directs the U.S. Forest Service to
carry out a
five-year pilot project that includes logging around 9,000 acres
annually in
small clear-cut blocks.
In addition, small trees and brush will be removed from up to
60,000 acres
annually to reduce the threat of wildfire in the Plumas and
Lassen national
forests and the Sierraville District of the Tahoe National
Forest.
The Quincy Library Group plan also makes about 500,000 acres of
national
forestland off-limits to logging and protects watersheds,
riparian and
wilderness areas.
The bill by Rep. Wally Herger, R-Marysville, sailed through the
House in July
1997 on a 429-1 vote. But it faced heavy opposition from over 140
regional
and national environmental groups that criticized the increases
in logging and
what they called micro-management of federal lands.
Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., the bill's Senate co-sponsor,
withdrew her
support and blocked the legislation from going to a debate and
vote before the
full Senate. The Quincy plan did not offer sufficient
environmental protections
and set a poor precedent for national forest management, Boxer
said.
The legislation remained in limbo until last week when Feinstein
attached it as a
rider to the 1999 federal spending bill. Until it is formally
approved by
Congress and signed by President Clinton, opponents will continue
to fight the
Quincy bill, said Louis Blumberg, a spokesman for the Wilderness
Society.
"We're bitterly disappointed that the pro-timber lobby in
Washington used this
backdoor approach -- this old-school traditional method for
special-interest
groups within the Beltway," Blumberg said.
The legislation includes about $11 million in federal funds to
reduce forest
fuels, improve habitat along streams and other wildlife
corridors, and study the
plan's environmental effects.
The estimated 50 percent increase in the Plumas, Lassen and Tahoe
forest
budgets is money that has to come from programs in other national
forests,
Blumberg said.
Members of the Quincy Library Group designed the plan to test new
forest
management techniques, which could have effects far beyond the
three national
forests. The group, which has around 30 active members, is one of
dozens of
coalitions around the country formed to solve local natural
resource problems
that have divided their communities.
Although several groups are older and have accomplished far more
on the
ground, the Quincy group became the most visible among them.
The legislation's success, so far, should encourage others, said
Tom Nelson, a
forester with Sierra Pacific Industries. The opposition only
turned the group
into a stronger coalition, he said.
"When it was time for labor to take the lead, labor leaders
did. When it was
time for the environmentalists, they did. That was our strength
-- everyone
played a role," said Nelson.
The Quincy group's success may herald a new way of doing
business, said Bill
Coates, a former Plumas County supervisor and group co-founder.
Instead of
waging battles that leave one side a winner and the other a
loser, the Quincy
Library Group demonstrates the potential for decisions made
through a process
in which each party gives up a little.
"Maybe we're learning that the best answers aren't total
victories for one side
or the other," Coates said.
Forest Service officials said they already have started a
preliminary review of
the Quincy plan's environmental effects and expect to have a
draft study ready
for public comment by the spring.
Sunday, January ,(, /),( 0(:,(:,( AM